October is national Bulling Awareness Month. To mark the
occasion, we are preparing some answers to Frequently Asked Questions
surrounding the issue of bullying. If you have a question that you would like
us to answer, you can message us on Facebook.
We can’t answer every question individually, but we can try to get the
“gist” of all of the questions and address the issues raised. If you missed the
first two entries in the series, the links for them are right here:
As a social strategy that depends on physical or social
strength, there has always been the potential for bullying to have political
over-tones. The targets of bullying are chosen because the bully believes that
they are acceptable targets for unacceptable treatment. While some bullying happens
because the bully has a personal problem with a single individual and justifies their treatment of their victim on those grounds, there is
another dynamic where groups of people become viewed as fair game for anybody
to mistreat.
In a local areas, children of racial, cultural, religious,
economic, social status or sexual minorities can be at higher risk for bullying. If the children in a neighborhood see that
authority figures take an attitude that certain groups are undesirable or
suspect, they are more likely to choose them as targets of bullying, less
likely to become part of the support network for the victims, and the victims
are more likely to internalize the message that they “deserve” this treatment
and be unprepared to stand up for themselves.
Anti-bullying programs that include the message that it is unacceptable to
bully someone because they belong to a disadvantaged minority are sometimes
accused of being part of a political agenda or strategy, because this issue intersects with other social justice issues. Thus, political activists on both sides of the social issues are compelled to become involved in the discussion.
However, no anti-bullying educational program can be
effective unless it includes material that makes it clear that it is
unacceptable to bully anyone. If there are groups of people that are implicitly
viewed as acceptable targets for mistreatment, an anti-bullying program must
explicitly state that they are not acceptable targets for mistreatment in order
to be effective. Additionally, official
policy and implementation of policy must be in line with that message. Without these actions, an acceptable class of
victims and a climate of “open season” can result.
The experience of Jamie Nabozny illustrates this phenomenon
very clearly.
The right to believe whatever you believe, and speak to
defend those beliefs, is very important. It is fundamental to all other rights. The right of human beings to
be safe from malicious harm is also very important and fundamental to all other rights. If you can't be secure in your person, you can't be secure in anything else.
The job for us as parents, educators, and peers
of those affected by bullying is to understand, teach, and strive to model
behavior that makes it clear: you do no
honor to your beliefs when you harm another person in their name, and that we
do not believe that any sort of violence, harassment, or defamation is supported
by appeals to belief or opinion.